Many states deny that they are involved in armed conflicts, arguing instead that they are engaged in counter-terrorism operations. The classification of situations of armed violence is fraught with difficulties. Similarly, war crimes can only be committed in connection with an armed conflict, the law of neutrality may be triggered and arms control treaty regimes may be affected. For instance, states and international organizations involved in armed conflicts will have rights and duties that do not exist outside that context. While there are many different definitions of armed conflict used for different purposes, the question of whether or not a situation of armed violence amounts to an armed conflict under IHL can have far-reaching consequences in the international legal system. RULAC is currently monitoring more than 80 armed conflicts involving at least 55 states and more than 70 armed non-State actors. Whether a situation of armed violence is an armed conflict pursuant to IHL criteria.
The legal framework governing armed conflicts.The definition and categories of armed conflict under IHL.It is primarily a legal reference source for a broad audience, including non-specialists, interested in issues surrounding the classification of armed conflicts under IHL. The Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts project (RULAC) is a unique online portal that identifies and classifies all situations of armed violence that amount to an armed conflict under international humanitarian law (IHL).
0 kommentar(er)
